battlesites and DO negates

[breadmaster]

was playing a game earlier, and a strange one came up

i had landed moleman's 11 on the site, and was going for the ko.  opponent wanted to play longshot's DO (personal negate) in a later round to remove it

i'm guessing that's not allowed, since the battlesite itself can't play a card offensively:  is this correct?

i'm assuming you CAN play the DO defensively to defend the site though

[Nostalgic]

As I was the other side of that equation I'd like to find out too. 

[gameplan.exe]

I'd say no to it either offensively or defensively, because the nature of those DO-negates are that they only protect that character, but Battlesites aren't characters...

[breadmaster]

hmmm...that's interesting

by that logic, cards like pretty boy and acrobatics couldn't be used to defend a site either.  i'm leaning towards all of them being usable defensively, but would have no problem playing either way

[steve2275]

I'd say no to it either offensively or defensively, because the nature of those DO-negates are that they only protect that character, but Battlesites aren't characters...

nor are they teammates 

[gameplan.exe]

hmmm...that's interesting

by that logic, cards like pretty boy and acrobatics couldn't be used to defend a site either.  i'm leaning towards all of them being usable defensively, but would have no problem playing either way

I suppose, taking that a step further, you couldn't really use any of the Specials to defend it except the AO and DB cards, since they don't require that a Character or Teammate be targeted by the wording of their text... so, I guess DO should be defensive, at least