attacks after conceding

[The Dude]

Quick question if you attack after conceding (Sabretooth, Wolverine) and use an AA do you get the follow up as well?

What if two people can attack after conceding may both do so? (Say Quicksilver and Mystique both had their 2 specials in the same battle). (My instinct is this has to be no but I figured I'd throw it out there).

[bamf!]

(61) Attacks that take place after an opponent concedes are limited to 1 attack to 1 Character. If a Special is played that grants follow-up attacks, the follow-up attacks are forfeited. Cards that requires a teammate's contribution (e.g., DoubleShot cards) can be used. Cards that require a teammates follow-up (teamworks, ally cards) cannot be used. Activator cards can be used.

bamf!

[Demacus]

But multiple attacks from multilple characters each with their own "attack after conceding" can all come out one after the other?  That's freaking brutal!

[Nate Grey]

Hey guys,

Was wondering if this was a way to possibly negate an opponents conceding special without having to actually use a negate special:

Opponent plays Ripclaw's MV (Play to Concede battle. Remove all Hits from Ripclaw's or teammate's Permanent Record and Hits from Current Battle.)

I play Wolverine's Rage (Wolverine may make 1 attack after opponent has conceded the battle. Opponent may defend.)

For Wolverine's 1 attack, would I be able to play Standoff (Only Wolverine and Target Character may attack, be attacked or defend this battle. Neither player may concede this battle.) and thereby negate the concede?

[gameplan.exe]

Hey guys,

Was wondering if this was a way to possibly negate an opponents conceding special without having to actually use a negate special:

Opponent plays Ripclaw's MV (Play to Concede battle. Remove all Hits from Ripclaw's or teammate's Permanent Record and Hits from Current Battle.)

I play Wolverine's Rage (Wolverine may make 1 attack after opponent has conceded the battle. Opponent may defend.)

For Wolverine's 1 attack, would I be able to play Standoff (Only Wolverine and Target Character may attack, be attacked or defend this battle. Neither player may concede this battle.) and thereby negate the concede?

Yes! I have brought up this exact combo! (BE to FD)! I don't remember where (probably in my thread about Standoff), but the results I got were pretty encouraging!

[DiceK]

I don't think you can cancel someones concession after it has been declared and ultimately accepted.  You are granted 1 more offensive action after the battle is conceded.  I don't think you can use FD as a way to negate (defend) a concession.

[BlueFire]

The card would never go into effect if the battle had not already been conceded.

The card happens AFTER the concession and does not grant the ability to play other additional cards after a concession. 

Since it says AFTER opponent concedes and not WHEN opponent concedes this should be a clear answer.  If it said WHEN then I would have to think about it, but since it doesn't I won't.

Easy enough.

[Nate Grey]

Thanks for the feedback. Would have been cool if that Standoff play was legit. Good to know nonetheless. 

[gameplan.exe]

This is so hypothetical that if the right combination ever came up, I'd totally let it happen just to witness the epic tale.

[DiceK]

This is so hypothetical that if the right combination ever came up, I'd totally let it happen just to witness the epic tale.

I've seen that a lot on this forum.  Most of the time w/ characters I've never even seen played in a deck.  But it's nice to get hypothetical sometimes.